مدل یابی روابط ساختاری عملکرد و سازگاری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان دبیرستانی براساس دلبستگی به معلّم با میانجیگری کاربری آسیب‌زا از تلفن همراه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی عمومی، گروه روان‌شناسی عمومی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، گیلان، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه روان‌شناسی عمومی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، گیلان، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت،‌ ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف مدلیابی روابط ساختاری عملکرد و سازگاری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان دبیرستانی براساس دلبستگی به معلّم با میانجیگری کاربری آسیب‌زا از تلفن همراه انجام شد. روش پژوهش توصیفی-همبستگی و از نوع معادلات ساختاری بوده‌است. 748 نفر از دانش آموزان دختر و پسر دورة متوسطه شهرستان رشت که در سال تحصیلی 1399-1400 تحصیل می‌کردند، به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای دو مرحله‌ای انتخاب و به نسخة الکترونیکی پرسشنامه‌های سازگاری تحصیلی بیکر و سریاک (1984)، عملکرد تحصیلی فام و تیلور (1990)، کاربری آسیب‌زا از تلفن‌همراه جنارو (2007) و دلبستگی به معلم لواسانی و مهدی‌پور (2015) پاسخ دادند. برای تحلیل روابط میانجی از همبستگی پیرسون، الگویابی معادلات ساختاری و روش بوت‌استرپ استفاده شد. نتایج حاکی از روابط مثبت بین دلبستگی ایمن به معلم و عملکرد و سازگاری تحصیلی (01/0p<) و روابط معکوس بین سطوح دلبستگی اجتنابی و اضطرابی به معلم و کاربری آسیب‌زا تلفن‌همراه با عملکرد و سازگاری تحصیلی (01/0p<) بوده است. تحلیل بوت‌استراپ نیز آشکار ساخت کاربری آسیب‌زا از تلفن‌همراه در رابطۀ بین دلبستگی اضطرابی و اجتنابی به معلم و سازگاری و عملکرد تحصیلی به ‌طورمعنی‌داری میانجیگری می‌کند (01/0 p<). بنابراین دلبستگی ایمن به معلم نقش سازنده‌ای بر عملکرد و سازگاری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان دارد و تاثیر کاربری آسیب‌زا از تلفن‌همراه را بی‌اثر می‌کند. همچنین در سبک دلبستگی اضطرابی و اجتنابی به معلم، متغیر کاربری از تلفن‌همراه نقش جبران‌کننده برای عدم وجود دلبستگی ایمن ایجاد می‌کند. شایسته است ایجاد دلبستگی ایمن به دانش‌آموزان و معلم‌ها آموزش داده شود تا شاهد بهبود عملکرد و سازگاری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان باشیم.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural Relationships Modeling of High School Students' Scholastic Adjustment and Performance based on Attachment to the Teacher with Mediation of Problematic Cell phone Use

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Kabir Dehboneh 1
  • Sajjad Rezaei 2
  • Ashkan Naseh 3
1 Masters of General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study was conducted to examine the structural relationships modeling of high school students’ performance and scholastic adjustment based on attachment to the teacher with the mediation of the problematic cell phone use (PCU). This descriptive-correlational research used structural equations modeling. From among students of the academic year 2021-2022, 748 male and female junior high school students of Rasht city were selected by two-stage cluster sampling method. They responded to the electronic version of Baker and Siryk’s Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (1984), Pham and Taylor’s academic performance questionnaire (1990), Jenaro’s cell phone overuse scale (2007) and Attachment to the Teacher Scale by Lavasani and Mehdipour (2015). The results indicated that secure attachment to teacher has a constructive role in students' academic performance and adaptability, and neutralizes the impact of PCU. In addition, in students with anxious/avoidant attachment to teacher, PCU creates a compensatory role for the lack of secure attachment. It is essential that students and teachers learn how to create a secure attachment to improve students' performance and academic adjustment.
Introduction
Academic adjustment becomes more important when a teenager enters junior high school, and it is affected by motivation, family status, personal and social skills, and cultural and psychological factors. One of the important social factors that play a role in the occurrence of adjustment is the child's relationship with caregivers in the first years of life, which leads to the formation of attachment styles and is the basis of interpersonal relationships in adulthood. Fogel (1997) considers attachment as a stable emotional bond between two people such that each of the two parties tries to maintain proximity to the object of attachment and behaves to ensure that the relationship continues. Likewise, during adolescence, communication with the teacher and peers also has a special place (Tian, Han, and Huebner, 2014). In this research, supportive relationships are considered as attachment to teacher.
Furthermore, attachment is considered an influencing factor in the Internet addiction, which is in other words the problematic cell phone use (PCU). (Mikulincer and Shaver, 2007). Liu et al. (2020) investigated the relationship between the long-term use of mobile phones and poor academic performance in adolescents, and reported increasingly poorer academic performance associated with increasing the use of mobile phones. Now, the main research question is whether PCU has a mediating role in the relationship between attachment to teacher and students' academic performance and adjustment.
Methodology
This descriptive-correlational research used structural equations modeling. Attachment to teacher was an exogenous variable, adjustment and academic performance were endogenous variables, and PCU was a mediator variable. The statistical population includes all male and female students of junior and senior high schools in Rasht in the academic year 2021-2022. The sample size was 784. To implement the study, first, all the schools affiliated with the Education Department of Rasht were listed. Then two-stage cluster sampling method was used to select some schools and then several classes in those schools. After that, with the informed consent and     permission of the school principal, the link of the questionnaires was presented to him and then it was made available to the students through the social media channels for students. The research was conducted by an online survey method. For this purpose, online versions of the tests used in this study were designed in the "Porsline" website platform, and distributed widely through educational social platforms (such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and Shad). To collect data, we used attachment to the teacher scale by Lavasani and Mehdipour (2015), student adaptation to college questionnaire by Baker and Siryk (1984), educational progress test (EPT), adapted from Pham and Taylor's research (1990), and cell phone overuse scale (COS) by Jenaro (2007).
Results
The results of the demographic profile of junior and senior high school students show that, 591 individuals (70.6 percent) of the participants were girls, 463 individuals ( 55.3 percent) were in the senior high schools, 212 individuals (25.3 percent) were in the 11th grade, and 805 individuals (96.2 percent) were in public schools. The results of the fit indices show that the proposed model has an acceptable fit although RMSEA was less than 0.1, and PCFI and PNFI were greater than 0.5  (Marsh and Roche, 1999; Fabrigar, Wegner, McCallum and Strahan, 1999). Furthermore, to improve the model, first, two non-significant paths of the model (secure attachment to PCU and secure attachment to academic performance) were removed. In the second step, the correlation between the covariance errors was plotted to create the final model (Figure-1). The results show that the modifications improved the goodness of fit of the final model to an acceptable level (χ2/df=3.928, RMSEA=0.051, CFI=0.962, GFI=0.945).
The results of the direct relationships of the research variables in the final model (Figure-1) show that all path coefficients in the whole sample, except secure attachment style to PCU and avoidant attachment style to academic performance, were statistically significant. In the final research model, secure attachment style variables had a positive and significant relationship with adjustment and academic performance, and avoidant and anxious attachment styles had a positive and significant relationship with PCU. A negative and significant relationship was observed between the variables of anxious attachment style and adjustment and academic performance, between avoidant attachment style and academic adjustment, and between PCU and adjustment and academic performance. Table 1 shows the standard coefficients of all paths and critical values in the final model.
Table 2 shows the results of bootstrap test in the MACRO program of Preacher and Hayes (2008) to test the mediating paths.
The final model of this research has six indirect or mediating paths. PCU has a mediating role in the relationship between anxious attachment to the teacher and academic adjustment and academic performance. In addition, a similar result was obtained for avoidant attachment. However, the PCU did not play a mediating role in the relationship between secure attachment to the teacher and academic adjustment and academic performance (Table-2).
Discussion and conclusion
The results of the bootstrap analysis reveal that the variable of problematic cell phone use does not play a mediating role in the relationship between secure attachment to the teacher and academic performance. This means that PCU cannot strongly change the effects of secure attachment to the teacher on academic performance and adjustment. This finding indicates that if a secure attachment to the teacher is formed, it will have an improving effect on students' adjustment and performance, and this relationship, at least according to the data of this study, will not be distorted by PCU.
The results show that, in general, all paths to PCU, except safe attachment style paths, and avoidant attachment style paths to academic performance were statistically significant, which indicates the strong effect of secure attachment on academic performance and adjustment. The final model of the research shows a positive and significant relationship between secure attachment style and adjustment and academic performance, and between avoidant and anxious attachment styles and PCU. In addition, in this model, negative and significant relationships were observed between anxious attachment style and adjustment and academic performance, between avoidant attachment style and academic adjustment, and between PCU with adjustment and academic performance. Considering the estimates of the indirect effect in the bootstrap samples, the strongest indirect effects pertained to secure attachment paths with academic performance and adjustment. These results tell education psychologists that academic performance and adjustment can be effectively improved, and the consequences of PCU can be significantly reduced through developing a secure attachment style to the teacher.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cell phone
  • Students
  • Attachment to teacher
  • Academic adjustment
  • Academic performance
Ahmadee, P., Khaademee, E., & Fattahee Bayaat, S. (2009). Social adjustment and use of new technologies among high school sophomores in Tehran. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education5(3), 9-36 https://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2009.18  (Text in Persian)
Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. lawrence hillsdale.
Babushkina, E. A., Belokopytova, L. V., Grachev, A. M., Meko, D. M., & Vaganov, E. A. (2017). Variation of the hydrological regime of Bele-Shira closed basin in Southern Siberia and its reflection in the radial growth of Larix sibirica. Regional Environmental Change, 17(6), 1725-1737 https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413614050038
Baker, R. W., & Siryk, B. (1984). Measuring adjustment to college. Journal of counseling psychology, 31(2), 179 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.2.179
Baker, R. W., & Siryk, B. (1999). SACQ: Student adaptation to college questionnaire: Manual. Western Psychological Services https://doi.org/10.1037/t06525-000
Bakhshayesh, A., Jesmani, S., & Afshani, J. (2015). The effect of smart schools on computer anxiety, self-regulation and academic performance of high school students comparing with non-smart schools. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education11(2), 34-48 https://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2015.1875
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191  
Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational psychology review, 21(2), 141-170 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.932
Billieux, J. (2012). Problematic use of the mobile phone: A literature review and a pathways model. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 8(4), 299-307 https://doi.org/10.2174/157340012803520522
Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., d'Acremont, M., Ceschi, G., & Zermatten, A. (2007). Does impulsivity relate to perceived dependence on and actual use of the mobile phone?. Applied cognitive psychology, 21(4), 527-537 https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1289
Bowlby J. Attachment and loss. Attachment. 2th ed. London: The Hogarth Press and institute of psychoanalysis; 1996.  Brian, M., Galla, J., Wood, E. T., Kim Har, A. W., & Chiu David, A. (2014). A longitudinal multilevel model analysis of the within-person and between-person effect of effortful engagement and academic self-efficacy on academic performance. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 123-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.04.001
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(4), 810 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.810
Credé, M., & Niehorster, S. (2012). Adjustment to College as Measured by the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire: A Quantitative Review of its Structure and Relationships with Correlates and Consequences. Educational Psychology
Dartaj, F., & Delavar, A. (2005). The effect of process and product mental simulation in improving students' performance and academic progress. New educational ideas, 1(2), 7-21 SID. https://sid.ir/paper/86739/fa (Text in Persian)
Dixit, S., Shukla, H., Bhagwat, A. K., Bindal, A., Goyal, A., Zaidi, A. K., & Shrivastava, A. (2010). A study to evaluate mobile phone dependence among students of a medical college and associated hospital of central India. Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 35(2), 339 https://doi.org/10.4103%2F0970-0218.66878
Dourtaj,F. Rajabian Dehzira, M. Fathoullahi, F. Dourtaj.F. (1397). The relationship between the use of virtual social networks with feelings of loneliness and marital infidelity in students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14 (47), 119-140 SID. https://sid.ir/paper/112099/fa (Text in Persian)
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological methods, 4(3), 272 https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Galla, B. M., Wood, J. J., Tsukayama, E., Har, K., Chiu, A. W., & Langer, D. A. (2014). A longitudinal multilevel model analysis of the within-person and between-person effect of effortful engagement and academic self-efficacy on academic performance. Journal of School Psychology52(3), 295-308 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.04.001
Ghoolmomadian, M. Yasemi Nejad, P. (1390). Standardization, validity and reliability of the scale of harmful use of COS mobile phones in students. New discoveries in psycology, 6 (19), 37-52 SID. https://sid.ir/paper/175082/fa  (Text in Persian)
Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Gómez-Vela, M., González-Gil, F., & Caballo, C. (2007). Problematic internet and cell-phone use: Psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addiction research & theory, 15(3), 309-320 https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350701350247
Johnson, S. M., & Whiffen, V. E. (Eds.). (2003). Attachment processes in couple and family therapy. Guilford Press.
Jury, M., Smeding, A., Court, M., & Darnon, C. (2015). When first-generation students succeed at university: On the link between social class, academic performance, and performance-avoidance goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 25-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.001
Kamibeppu, K., & Sugiura, H. (2005). Impact of the mobile phone on junior high-school students' friendships in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(2), 121-130 https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.121
Kim, K. R., & Seo, E. H. (2015). The relationship between procrastination and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 26-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.038
Kline, R. (2016). Data preparation and psychometrics review. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed., pp. 64-96). New York, NY: Guilford.
 Koenig, H. G. (1995). Religion and older men in prison. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10(3), 219-230 https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.930100308
Lavasani, M. Mehdipoor, F. (1394). Teacher attachment and academic conflict in male and female students. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 119-132 doi:10.22059/JAPR.2015.61426 (Text in Persian)
Legkauskas, V., & Steponavičiūtė-Kupčinskė, I. (2021). Links between in-class use of social media and school adjustment of high-school pupils. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2853-2861 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10389-9
Liu, X., Luo, Y., Liu, Z. Z., Yang, Y., Liu, J., & Jia, C. X. (2020). Prolonged mobile phone use is associated with poor academic performance in adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(5), 303-311 https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0591
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1999). Reply upon SET research. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.517
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. new york, NY: Guilford.
Montgomery, S., Gregg, D. H., Somers, C. L., Pernice-Duca, F., Hoffman, A., & Beeghly, M. (2019). Intrapersonal Variables Associated with Academic Adjustment in United States College Students. Current Psychology, 38(1), 40-49 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9533-0
Mueller, R. O. (2012). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. Springer Science & Business Media [Link].
Nasiri, M. Michael Moonie, F. Eisazadeghan, A. (1396). Investigating the structural relationships of perceived difficulty, social comparison and academic self-concept with academic adjustment (Case study: Undergraduate students of Urmia University). Journal of Research in School and Virtual Learning, 5 (1), 9-22 SID. https://sid.ir/paper/263004/fa (Text in Persian)
Özcan, Y. Z., & Koçak, A. (2003). Research note: A need or a status symbol? Use of cellular telephones in Turkey. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 241-254 https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323103018002004
Pedrero-Perez, E. J. et al. (2018). Information and Communications Technologies (ICT): Problematic use of Internet, Video Games, Mobile Phones, Instant Messaging and Social Networks using MULTICAGE-TIC. Adicciones, 30(1), 19-32  https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.806
Perret, P., Ayad, M., Dauvier, B., & Congard, A. (2019). Self-and parent-rated measures of personality are related to different dimensions of school adjustment. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 182-189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.02.007
Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 250-260 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002010
Pratt, A. T. (2005). Relations between adult attachment representations, affect regulation and affect expression in marital relationships https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9041653
Prino, L. E., Longobardi, C., Fabris, M. A., & Settanni, M. (2023). Attachment behaviors toward teachers and social preference in preschool children. Early Education and Development34(4), 806-822 https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2085980
Pundir, P., Andrews, T., Binu, V. S., & Kamath, R. (2016). Association of problematic mobile phone use with psychological distress and self-esteem among college students in South India: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 3(10), 2841-2849 https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20163371
Ragupathi, D., Ibrahim, N., Tan, K. A., & Andrew, B. N. (2020). Relations of bedtime mobile phone use to cognitive functioning, academic performance, and sleep quality in undergraduate students. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(19), 7131 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197131
Rees, C. A. (2005). Thinking about children’s attachments. Archives of disease in childhood, 90(10), 1058-1065 https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2004.068650
Rezai Sharif, Ghazi Tabatabai, Hejazi, & Ajei. (2012). Investigating students' views on school bonding: a qualitative study. Psychology, 61(16), 16-35 SID. https://sid.ir/paper/478767/fa  (Text in Persian)
Schmidt, S., Nachtigal, C., Wuethrich -Martone, O., & Strauss, B. (2002). Attachment and coping with chronic disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 763 -773 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00335-5
Sharpe K. Parental influence on the development of children 2004. Available from: https://people.creighton.
Tanyi, M. E. (2002). The Student's Adjustment Inventory Manual. IFE PsychologIA, 10(1), 1-14 https://doi.org/10.4314/ifep.v10i1.23470
Tavakoli, Y. (2005). programs and activities of Guidance and counseling in middle school. Tehran: Varaye danesh.
Tian, L., Han, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2014). Preliminary development of the adolescent students' basic psychological needs at school scale. Journal of adolescence, 37(3), 257-267 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.01.005
Vedel, A., Thomsen, D. K., & Larsen, L. (2015). Personality, academic majors and performance: Revealing complex patterns. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 69-76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.030
Waters, S., & Cross, D. (2010). Measuring students' connectedness to school, teachers, and family: Validation of three scales. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(3), 164. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020942
Wilkinson, J., Santoro, N., & Major, J. (2017). Sudanese refugee youth and educational success: The role of church and youth group in supporting cultural and academic adjustment and schooling achievement. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 60, 210-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.04.003.
Zandi, A. (1382). Intimate relationship between teacher and student. 178, 33-43 http://noo.rs/Z31cm (Text in Persian)