The causal modeling of creativity: The role of teacher-student interaction styles and basic psychological needs

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Alzahra University

2 null

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigating the mediatory role of the satisfaction of basic psychological needs in relationship between Teacher Interaction and students creativity. This study is a path analysis correlational research. Community of the research includes girl students of sixth-grade from second district of Tehran. Research sample was composed of 250 students who selected Randomly. Participates answered the Abedi creativity questionnaire (1363), Deci and Ryan's Basic Psychological Needs questionnaire (2000) and Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) (Wubbels, 1993).Good Reliability (calculated by cronbach’s alpha) and validity (calculated by factor analysis)of every Questionnaires were obtained. The Results showed that four of eight Teacher Interaction’s types had good fitness models. The relationship between leading and uncertain types and creativity with mediatory of the satisfaction of basic psychological needs, was positive and significant and The relationship between understanding and responsibility/freedom types and creativity with mediatory of the satisfaction of basic psychological needs, was negative and significant. The Results indicate that the satisfaction of basic psychological needs is a convenient mediator variable for relationship between leading, uncertain, understanding and responsibility/freedom of eight types of Teacher Interaction and students creativity.

Keywords

References

Albert. R. (2005). Evoluation of Human Intelligence, www.biology-online.org-IQ Creativity Learning. htm.
Amabile, T. (1983). Motivation and Creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers journal of   personality  and social psychology, 48: 393-399.
Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. in Sternberg, RJ (ed.) The Nature of Creativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univ.
Chen, K.C. and Jang, S.J.(2010)." Motivation in online Learning. Testing a model of self - determination theory".  Journal of Computers in human behavior. 26: 741–752
Conti,R., Collins,M. and Picariello,M.L.(2001). The impact of competition on intrinsic motivation and creativity: considering gender, gender segregation role –orientation. Journal of personality and Individual Differences, 30:1273-1289.
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. (1989). Social, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In Strenberg, R.J. The nature of creativity contemporary psychological perspectives combridge University press.
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits:Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4): 227-268.
Do,Young choi. kun,Chang lee. and Seong,Wook chae.(2012). The effect of individual psychological characteristics on creativity revelation:Emphasis with psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation.Brain Informatics. Lecture notes". In computer science volume. 7670,p:130-139.
Egan Toby Marshall (2005). Factors Influencing individual creativity In the Work Place: an Examination of Quantitative Empirical Research. Available: www//adh.Sagepub.Com/cgi/content.
Eric ,von Hippel (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Guardia, G. J., Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2000). Within person variation in security of attachment: A self theory perspective on attachment, Need Fulfillment and wellbeing. Journal of personality and social psychology,79: 367-384.
Koestner. R., Ryan, R.M., Bernieri,F. and Holl.K. (1984). Setting limits on childrens behavior: The differential effects of controlling versas informational styles on Intrinsic Motivation and creativity. Journal of personality. 52(3):233-248
Lizarraga,M,L., Baquedano,M,T. and Closas,A.H.(2014). An explanatory model regarding the relationships between psychological traits and creativity.Anales de psicologia. 30.1,p:355-363.
Pintrich, P. and Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in Education: Theory,Research, and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall
Renzulli, J.R. (1998). The three – ring conception of giftedness. In: S.M.Baum, S.M. Reis, and L.R. Maxfield (Eds.). Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Sheldon,K.M., Elliot,A.J., Kim,Y. and Kasser,T.(2001). What is satisfying event Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of personality and social psychology. 80:325-339
Torrance.E.P. (1990). Torrance Tests of creative thinking. Figural and verbal (A). Benserille, IL: scholastic testing service
Wallace, Belle. (2003).  Creativity  Some Definitions. The  Creative Personality. The Creative Classroom, In Gifted education International. 4: 63-73 , A.B Academic Publisher
Wubbles, T., Creton, H., Levy, J. and Hooymayers, H. (1993). The model for interpersonal behavior . in T. Wubbels., and J. Levy. (Eds), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relations in Education. London: The Flamer Press.
Yildrimi, A. (2010). Creativity in early childhood education program. Procedia social and behavior science. (9:1565-1575.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics