review and critique of conceptual analysis as a method of research in education

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review and critique of conceptual analysis as a method of research in education In order to identify the strengths and weaknesses of these methods in educational research. Qualitative research and using analytical and critical approach is done. Thus in the research, conceptual analysis methods in education has been studied. .The purpose of this paper is to review and critique of conceptual analysis as a method of research in education In order to identify the strengths and weaknesses of these methods in educational research. Qualitative research and using analytical and critical approach is done. Thus in the research, conceptual analysis methods in education has been studied. .of these methods in educational research. Qualitative research and using analytical and critical approach is done. Thus in the research, conceptual analysis methods in education has been studied.

Keywords

References

 
Beaney, M. (2003). Analysis, The Standard Encyclopedia of Philosophy, london: Rutledge.
Carr, W. (1987). What is an Educational Practice? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 21(2):163-175.
Dummet, M. (1993). Origins of Analitical Philosophy, U.S.A: Bloom Bury Academic.
Edel, A. (1993). Analitic Philosophy of  Education at the Crossroads, in: Philosophy of Education, In:
Evers, C.W (1993). Analitic & Post Analitic Philosophy of Education:Methodological Reflection, Discourse, The Australian Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2): 35-45.
Foley, R. (1999). Analysis, Entry in the Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, London: Cambridge University Press.
Hirst, P.H. (1983). Educational Theory & its Foundation Disciplines: Rutledge.
Hirst, P.H. & With, P. (1998a). Philosophy of Education, Major Themes in the Analitic Tradition, Philosophy and Education, Volume I, London&  New York: Routledge.
Hirst, P.H. & With, P. (1998). Philosophy of Education, Major Themes in the Analitic Tradition, Problems of Educational Content & practices, Volume IV, London and New York: Routledge.
Ozmon, H.A & Craver, M.S. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Education, U.S.A: Prentice, Hall.
Quine, w.v.o.(1996). From a logical Point of View, Oxford: Blackwell, New York: Harper & Row.
Robin, B. (2007). An Introduction to Moral Philosophy and Moral Education, London & New York, Rutledge, Taylor & Francis Grupe.  
Rorty, R. (1999). Consequences of Pragmatism, Essay: An Essay on Wittgenstein,U.S.A: Minnesota University Press.
Scheffler, I. (1974). Language of Education,U.S.A: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
Tashakkory, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed  Methodology: Combining Qualitative & Quantitative ‌Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics