The Effect of Native-Local Games Based on Constraint-led and Teaching Game for Understanding Approaches on the Implicit Learning of Girl Students

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to investigate the effect of constraint-led approach and teaching game for understanding approaches on students' implicit learning in the form of native-local games. For this purpose, a quasi-experimental method with pre-test-post-test design and purposive sampling method was used. The current research included students aged 10-11 years old, divided into three groups of CLA, TGFU and control. The participants were trained for two one-hour sessions per week for twelve weeks according to the educational approach. CogLab software was used to investigate implicit learning. The results of the mixed ANOVA showed a significant difference between the pre-test and the post-test in the CLA and TGFU groups. Furthermore, 95% and 94% of the changes in students' implicit learning were influenced by CLA and TGFU teaching method. However, no significant changes were observed in traditional education. Therefore, it can be stated that the use of non-linear approaches can improve students' implicit learning.
Introduction
The latest trends in education indicate changing educational approaches and teaching methods while trying to increase student participation and improve the learning process (Trajkovik et al., 2018). Criticisms of such traditional approaches to learning, which are still considered in some studies (Haibach-Beach et al., 2023), started in the 1980s with the emergence of the constraint-led approach (CLA) (Davids et al., 2005). The constraint-led approach originated from the work of Newell (1986) and has emerged as an educational option for teachers and coaches in sport and physical education, and at its simplest, this approach appears to be a direct model for teachers (Renshaw & Chow, 2019). According to the findings of Liu (2023), the constraint-led approach places learners at the center of the learning process and promotes their active participation and motivation. This approach takes advantage of intrinsic motivation and strengthens a sense of ownership and agency by providing autonomy, choice, and opportunities for self-directed learning to data learners.
In the late 1970s, in response to growing dissatisfaction with conventional approaches to learning, the teaching games for understanding (TGFU) approach emerged. The researchers in this model confirmed that if tactical considerations are emphasized in a game, children will find that games can be interesting and enjoyable" (Bunker & Thorpe, 1986). In their research, Ortiz et al. (2023) showed that TGfU can be a suitable educational approach to use in any situation to improve learning and skill performance.
Overall, based on the evidence presented above, despite significant efforts by Newell et al. (1986) to advance the understanding of movement learning among educators through a constraint-led approach, as well as Thorpe et al. However, very few applied studies have been conducted on the above approaches by motor learning researchers. Therefore, the lack of empirical evidence in the use of two non-linear, constraint-led approaches and teaching game for understanding in schools is one of the reasons for of conducting this research. This research measured learning in a dynamic state, i.e. during performing the game. Examining the studies conducted in non-linear approaches and compare them with linear approaches in terms of their effect, the current research sought to answer the question of whether native-local games based on non-linear educational approaches have a positive effect on students' implicit learning or not.
Methodology
The present applied research was of quasi-experimental type, with a pre-test and post-test design, which was conducted in the field. The statistical population of this research was all fifth-grade students of Tabriz city. Therefore, 42 students of 10-11 years were selected and randomly divided into three groups of CLA, TGFU and control. The current research included three stages of pre-intervention, intervention and post-intervention. In the pre-intervention stage, the participants were familiarized with the native-local game and research stages in one week. Furthermore, practice approaches were discussed separately, and tasks and goals were explained. Similarly, the researcher approached the sports teachers to discuss the purpose of the study. During a period of six lessons (three weeks), the native-local game was taught to the teachers using the CLA and TGFU model by the researcher. None of the teachers were experienced in using these approaches. Then, the dependent variable of the research was evaluated in the pre-test using the implicit learning test of CagLab software. Then, in the intervention phase, the independent variables of the research were examined with the protocols of native-local games based on the approach of non-linear education (CLA and TGFU) and linear education (control) for two one-hour sessions per week for twelve weeks separately in each group. Based on the type of the game, the necessary equipment was provided and the intervention was carried out in the desired space (school yard, classroom or a large covered space with flooring). The intervention was conducted during the second semester of the academic year 2021-2022, with the aim of exposing teachers to alternative approaches to teaching that challenge established beliefs and practices and change their role from teacher to facilitator (Harvey et al., 2010).
Results
Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check the normality of data distribution in pre-test scores. After confirming the normality of the data, one-way ANOVA was used to check the presence or absence of differences in the pre-test. In order to investigate the difference between pre-test and post-test in all three groups (CLA, TGFU and control group), 2x3x1 mixed ANOVA test was used for implicit learning variable.
According to the results of one-way ANOVA, there was no significant difference between the three groups in the pre-test in terms of implicit learning (F(2,39)=3.02, P=0.06). Next, the results obtained from the mixed ANAVA showed that the main effect of time (pre-test and post-test) (F(1,39)=905.14, P=0.0001), the main effect of group (CLA, TGFU and control group) (F(2,39)=277.77, P=0.0001), and the interaction effect between group and time (F(2,39)=227.91, P=0.0001) were significant.
The results of the pairwise comparison of the groups using Bonferroni's post hoc test in the constraint-led approach are: (F(1,39)=676.35, partialƞ2=0.94, P=0.0001), in the teaching game for understanding approach these findings gave: (F(1,39)=654.62, partialƞ2=0.95, P=0.0001) and for the control group it includes the following results: (F(1,39)=0.004, partialƞ2=0.004, P=0.95). The results revealed that native-local games based on the constraint-led approach and teaching game for understanding improve students' implicit learning such that probably 94% and 95% of the changes in students' implicit learning pertained to these approaches. While in the traditional group, only 0.04% change was observed in students' implicit learning. Therefore, it can be stated that the implementation of native-local games based on the TGFU has a greater effect on students' implicit learning than the traditional teaching approach.
Discussion and conclusion
The results of the present study showed that the students in the TGFU group showed a significant superiority in implicit learning compared to the CLA and traditional education (control) such that probably 95% of the changes in the students' implicit learning pertained to the non-linear approach of TGFU.
The results of the present study are consistent with the findings of bin Ibrahim and Siong (2021) who concluded in their research that native local games using non-linear TGFU approach are suitable for improving learning in children with learning disabilities such as dyslexia, autism, and late learning (Ibrahim et al., 2021).
However, our study had some limitations. Considering the dissatisfaction with the traditional education approach to learning in physical education environments, it is necessary to consider alternative educational approaches. According to the findings of the present research, non-linear approaches, which were investigated and compared with the conventional teaching method, proved to be superior. Therefore, we suggest that future studies continue to develop non-linear constraint-led approaches and teaching for game understanding with a focus on other sports disciplines.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Andrianto, J. R. (2023). Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) Learning Model on Learning Motivation in Soccer Learning. JOURNAL RESPECS (Research Physical Education and Sports)5(2), 296-300. https://doi.org/10.31949/respecs.v5i2.6054
Arias-Estero, J. L., Jaquero, P., Martínez-López, A. N., & Morales-Belando, M. T. (2020). Effects of two TGfU lessons period on game performance, knowledge and psychosocial variables in elementary physical education. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(10), 3378.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103378
Barba-Martín, R. A., Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & González-Calvo, G. (2020). The application of the teaching games for understanding in physical education. Systematic review of the last six years. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(9), 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093330
Barteit, S., Guzek, D., Jahn, A., Bärnighausen, T., Jorge, M. M., & Neuhann, F. (2020). Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 145, 103726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726
Beach, P. S., Perreault, M., Brian, A., & Collier, D. H. (2023). Motor learning and development: Human Kinetics . http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_20
Beheshti, S., & Manteghi, Y. (2011). The role of playing in children\'s education: viewpoints of Quran and Imams. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education7(3), 4-4. http://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2011.135 (Text in persian)
Bin Ibrahim, M. F., & Siong, G. K.-C. N. (2021). The Application of Teaching Games for Understanding Using the Traditional Games (TGfU) for Teaching Physical Education for Special Needs Children in Malaysia. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11869-4
Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1986). The curriculum model. Rethinking games teaching, 7-10. http://doi.org/ 10.4324/9781003247456
Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., & Renshaw, I. (2015). Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: An introduction: Routledge. http://doi.org//10.4324/9781003247456
Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., Davids, K., & Tan, C. W. K. (2021). Nonlinear Pedagogy and its implications for practice in the Singapore PE context. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(3), 230-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1886270
Chow, J. Y., Meerhoff, L. A., Choo, C. Z. Y., Button, C., & Tan, B. S. J. (2023). The effect of nonlinear pedagogy on the acquisition of game skills in a territorial game. Frontiers in Psychology14, 1077065. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077065
D'Angour, A. (2013). Plato and play: Taking education seriously in ancient Greece. American Journal of Play, 5(3), 293-307. http://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0009840X06003040
da Silva, R. M. R. (2022). Teaching Physical Education through student-centered approaches: A year-long action research study of an early-career teacher. http://doi.org/ 10.21680/2176-9036.2022v14n2ID29421
Eysenck, Michael W, Keane, Mark T. (2015). Cognitive psychology: language, thinking, emotions and consciousness (H.zare Translator) Tehran: Arjmand Book (2020) (Text in Persian)
FITTS, P., & POSNER, M. (1967). Human performance.[sl] Oxford. England: Brooks/Cole. http://doi.org/ 10.1109/MIAS.2023.3261103
Fleer, M., & Hedegaard, M. (2010). Early learning and development: Cultural-historical concepts in play: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/ 10.1163/9789004520066
Francis, G., Neath, I., MacKewn, A., & Goldthwaite, D. (2003). CogLab on a CD: Wadsworth Publishing Company. http://doi.org/ 10.4274/tnd.2022.99836
Ginciene, G., Amato, C., Rodrigues de Oliveira, E., Oliveira dos Santos, I., Dell Osbel, E., & Leonardi, T. J. (2023). Understanding the pedagogical practice in futsal teaching and learning process based on the TGfU approach. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 18(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541211070790
Haney, M., & Bissonnette, V. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions about the use of play to facilitate development and teach prosocial skills. Creative Education, 2(01), 41. http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.21006
Harvey, S., Cushion, C. J., Wegis, H. M., & Massa-Gonzalez, A. N. (2010). Teaching games for understanding in American high-school soccer: A quantitative data analysis using the game performance assessment instrument. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980902729354
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011
Kirk, D. (2005). Future prospects for teaching games for understanding. http://doi.org/ 10.5040/9781718210424.ch-014
Kociubuk, J., & Campana, K. (2024). Coding for play: Identifying and categorizing educator-designed group playful learning experiences in libraries and other informal learning environments. Library & Information Science Research46(1), 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101280
Liu, C. (2023). A Constraint-Led Approach: Enhancing Skill Acquisition and Performance in Sport and Physical Education Pedagogy. Studies in Sports Science and Physical Education1(1), 1-10. http://doi.org/10.56397/SSSPE.2023.06.01
Light, R. (2014). Quality teaching beyond games through game sense pedagogy. University of Sydney Papers in HMHCE–Special Game Sense Edition, 1-13. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/17408980902729388
Masters, R., & Maxwell, J. (2008). The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 160-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840802287218
Masyhuri, S. F., & Suherman, W. S. (2020). The traditional game learning model for the elementary school student character building. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Sport Science, Health, and Physical Education (ICSSHPE 2019). http://doi.org/ 10.2991/ahsr.k.200214.003
Mbachi, R. A., Enemuo, J. O., & Chigbo-Obasi, T. U. (2020). Perceived Influence of Play on Learning Activities Among Pupils in Anambra State. Journal of Early Childhood and Primary Education, 2(1), 49-60. http://doi.org/ 10.53819/81018102t5068
 Mulya, G. (2020). The Influence of Traditional Games on The Motor Development of Students with Disabilities. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 8(1), 1-5.
Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. Motor development on children: Aspects of coordination and control. http://doi.org/ 10.3390/sports11080139
Ortiz, M., Meroño, L., Morales-Belando, M. T., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., & González-Gálvez, N. (2023). Teaching Games for Understanding in Game Performance and Psychosocial Variables: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trial. Children10(3), 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10030573
Perfect, T.J; Lindsay, S.D (2013). The SAGE Handbook of Applied Memory. ( H, Zare; A.A, Sharifi; Sh, Mosavi Translators) Arjmand Pub (2022) (Text in Persian)
Pill, S. (2011). Teacher engagement with teaching games for understanding-game sense in physical education. Journal of Physical Education & Sport/Citius Altius Fortius, 11(2). http://doi.org/ 10.4324/9781003298298
Priyono, A., Sahudi, U., & Hendrayana, Y. (2021). Improvement on gross motor skills of intellectual disability students through games. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(4), 20-24. http://doi.org/ 10.13189/saj.2021.091304  
Renshaw, I., Araújo, D., Button, C., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Moy, B. (2016). Why the constraints-led approach is not teaching games for understanding: A clarification. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1095870
Renshaw, I., & Chow, J.-Y. (2019). A constraint-led approach to sport and physical education pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1552676
Renshaw, I., Headrick, J., Maloney, M., Moy, B., & Pinder, R. (2019). Constraints-led learning in practice: Designing effective learning environments. In Skill Acquisition in Sport (pp. 163-182): Routledge. http://doi.org/10.1080/17408980902791586
Roberts, W. M., Newcombe, D. J., & Davids, K. (2019). Application of a constraints-led approach to pedagogy in schools: Embarking on a journey to nurture physical literacy in primary physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1552675
Stran, M., Sinelnikov, O., & Woodruff, E. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ experiences implementing a hybrid curriculum: Sport education and teaching games for understanding. European Physical Education Review, 18(3), 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12450789
Syamsuar, S., & Zen, Z. (2021). Teaching game for understanding model: increasing motivation and students’ physical fitness. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 7(1), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.29210/02021951
Thorpe, R. (2005). Rod Thorpe on teaching games for understanding. Athlete-centred coaching: Developing inspired and inspiring people, 229-243. http:doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.21.2.177
Thalib, S. B., & Ahmad, M. A. (2020). The Outdoor Learning Modules Based on Traditional Games in Improving Prosocial Behaviour of Early Childhood. International Education Studies, 13(10), 88-104. http://doi.org/ 10.5539/ies.v13n10p88
Trajkovik, V., Malinovski, T., Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., & Vasileva, M. (2018). Traditional games in elementary school: Relationships of student’s personality traits, motivation and experience with learning outcomes. Plos one, 13(8), e0202172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202172
Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. P. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport: Taylor & Francis.
Zeng, N., Ayyub, M., Sun, H., Wen, X., Xiang, P., & Gao, Z. (2017). Effects of physical activity on motor skills and cognitive development in early childhood: a systematic review. BioMed research international, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2760716