Examining the factorial structure of indicators affecting the growth of innovation and the development of children's ideation

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student of the Faculty of Psychology and Education University of Tehran. Iran

2 Associate Professor of the Faculty of Psychology and Education University of Tehran. Iran

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran. Iran

Abstract

The golden seed of innovation is the idea. Ideation is one of the basic skills of children. this study was conducted in order to prioritize the growth indicators of children's ideation and innovation. The research has been practical from the point of view of the goal and quantitative from the point of view of the method. The research method was confirmatory factor analysis, the statistical community of teachers in Tehran and the sample size was 260 teachers. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire and the validity of the tool was confirmed by experts' opinion and reliability with Cronbach's alpha of 0.814. The results of the research showed that the use of ideation tools and coaching had the highest effectiveness, also ideation breaks repetitive mental patterns, increases children's attention to multiple angles of the problem, and creates innovative ideas.
Introduction
Today's world is the world of innovation, and in the meantime, flourishing in schools today is examined as a superstructure (Jongbloed et al., 2016, p.1). In recent years, concepts related to children's innovation, including children's start-ups, talk shows and scientific stand-ups, are a platform for the growth of children's ideas. In today's era, teachers and educational policy makers should seek to develop skills that will help the child to become a happy, healthy and successful member (Zubaidah et al. 2017, quoted by Bahrami et al., 2021, p. 2). Idea is the core of inventions and innovations (Weber, 2012, p. 2) and searching for ideas is the first step in the path of innovation.
Ideas have the ability to drive innovations and have been conceptualized in many forms. Ideas are referred to as hidden wealth and ideas can be considered valuable resources. Among the basic characteristics of idea seeking, we can mention fertility, unstop ability of the flow of ideas, pragmatism and attraction to the surroundings. The research results of  Valacich, et al. (2006, p. 12) indicate that the presentation of unique ideas leads to an increase in the number of quality ideas among participants with high cognitive abilities. One of the examples of the application of ideation is the development of idea-oriented knowledge, which is based on collaborative knowledge-building activities, based on idea-oriented (Hong and Lin, 2019, p. 17).
Methodology
The current research was conducted with the aim of ranking the indicators that affect the growth and development of children's ideation and innovation using the factor analysis method. From the point of view of the goal, the research was applied, and in terms of method and data collection, it was a descriptive survey. The tool of data collection in the current research was a questionnaire created by the researcher and supervised by two sections of demographic information and items section. The statistical population of the research was elementary school teachers in Tehran and the sampling method was a random cluster that was implemented in a single stage. The sample size was 260 teachers in Tehran. In order to measure the validity of the collection tool, content and face validity were used. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Since Cronbach's alpha was above 0.7 and its value was 0.814, the questionnaire had the necessary reliability
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the identified factors. Smart PLS software was used for this purpose. In the first step, the factor load of each item was estimated on the extracted components; Because the obtained factor loadings for all components were higher than 0.4 and the significance level of relationships was confirmed at the 0.05 level; Therefore, the role of the items in forming the extracted components was meaningfully explained. The results are presented in Figure 1.
In order to check the convergent validity at the factor level, the extracted mean variance index of EVA was used. The minimum suitable value for this coefficient is 0.5. All the values ​​presented in the table 1 below are higher than 0.5, so this indicates the appropriate convergent validity of the extracted items. The main criteria for internal consistency are Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability, which provide an estimate of reliability based on the internal correlation and different external loadings of the observed representative variables (Hair et al., 2021). According to the presented results, the values ​​of Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability support the results favorably and the reliability indices are acceptable and the extracted subscales have good validity and reliability. In the following, in order to evaluate the factorial structure of the fundamental factors affecting the flourishing of ideas and innovation of children and to estimate the goodness of fit of the model, the following indexes were used: chi-square (χ²), ratio of chi-square to degrees of freedom (χ²/df), incremental fit index (IFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), Root Mean Square Approximation Index (RMSEA) and Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) were measured in this model.
Discussion and conclusion
The results of the prioritization of factors indicate the power of ideation tools. Changing the teacher's role to coach was identified as the second factor and questioning as the third factor of seeking ideas. Ideation leads to the development of children's thinking outside the framework and the development of children's personalities and talents and Innovation leads to finding different and broad perspectives on issues and strengthening children's decision-making ability. This helps them to try to solve the problem by using the limited resources they have. As the results show, methods such as strengthening children's visualization, creative display, and using analogical and metaphorical methods effectively strengthen students' innovative thinking skills and play an important role in the learning process.
The innovative characteristics of teachers are directly related to the type of teaching leading to the discovery of new ideas by students, and there is a negative correlation between traditional and innovative teaching  (Yukos and Akar, 2018). During the process of searching for ideas, different aspects grow and develop in children. By brainstorming, questioning and trying to find new ideas, children examine issues from different perspectives and seek non-repetitive and creative ideas for issues. ideation leads  breaking of repetitive mental patterns in them and the development of children's personality and talents. Innovation leads to finding different and broad perspectives on issues and strengthening children's decision-making ability, and helps them to try to solve the problem by using the limited resources they have. The questionableness of educational spaces turns the physical components of the environments into tools for learning. It is suggested that future research should focus on the ideation qualifications of elementary school teachers.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ardaiz-Villanueva, O., Nicuesa-Chacón, X., Brene-Artazcoz, O., de Acedo Lizarraga, M. L. S., & de Acedo Baquedano, M. T. S. (2011). Evaluation of computer tools for idea generation and team formation in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 56(3), 700-711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.012
Armon, S., QaraDaghi, A., Vahedi, Sh. (2022). The effectiveness of Montessori method education on the neuro-psychological functions of students with non-verbal learning disorders, New Educational Thoughts Quarterly, Volume 17, Number 4, pp. 7-33(Text in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2021.33510.3165
Bahrami, N., Hosseini al-Madani, S. A., Mutoli, S., Khoyyini, F. (2021). The effectiveness of creative problem-solving education in the Terez method in improving problem solving skills with emphasis on the mediating role of critical thinking and feeling of belonging to the school, scientific journal of innovation and creativity in human sciences, 11th period, number one, pp. 161-188 (Text in Persian).
Beheshti Mashhadi, S. and Zare, H. (2024). Structural Equation Modeling of the Relationship between Unwanted Intrusive Thoughts and Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms, According to the Mediating Role of Cognitive Appraisal, Emotional Responses and Neutralization Strategies. Social Cognition, (), -. doi: 10.30473/sc.2024.71233.2976 (Text in Persian).
Blegur, J., Rajagukguk, C. P. M., Sjioen, A. E., & Souisa, M. (2023). Innovation of Analytical Thinking Skills Instrument for Throwing and Catching Game Activities for Elementary School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16140a
Cooper, R. G. (1983). A process model for industrial new product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1983.6448637
Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching & learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education-Washington, 101(4), 738.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
Cutting, N. (2013). Children's tool making: from innovation to manufacture, University of Birmingham.
DaSilva, R. H., Kaminski, P. C., & Armellini, F. (2020). Improving new product development innovation effectiveness by using problem solving tools during the conceptual development phase: Integrating Design Thinking and TRIZ. Creativity and Innovation Management29(4), 685-700.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12399
Davies, S., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2023). Idea generation and knowledge creation through maker practices in an artifact-mediated collaborative invention project. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 39, 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100692
Diklić, K. (2019). Education for Innovation in Elementary School. International Journal of Economics & Law, 9(26), 35-46.‏
Dugosh, K. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of experimental social psychology, 41(3), 313-320. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.009
Eragamreddy, N. (2013). Teaching creative thinking skills. International Journal of english language & translation studies, 1(2), 124-145.
 Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Ischebeck, A., Weiss, E. M., & Ebner, F. (2012). Stimulating creativity via the exposure to other people's ideas. Human brain mapping, 33(11), 2603-2610.https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fhbm.21387
Flynn, M., Dooley, L., O'SULLIVAN, D., & Cormican, K. (2003). Idea management for organisational innovation. International Journal of innovation management, 7(04), 417-442. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000878
Ghasemi, S., & Atainejad. (2012). A new form of ideation system for citizens' participation - a case study of Mashhad idea system. The conference of proposal system (the fifth national festival) (Text in Persian).
Habibi, Rouzbeh, Asghari, Zahra, and Jafari, Kamran. (2017). Identifying and prioritizing the effective factors on the development of the growth centers of technology units of the university (case study: the growth center of technology units of Gilan University). Technology Growth, 14(56), 1-9(Text in Persian).
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S., ... & Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: a workbook, 1-29.‏
Härkki, T., Vartiainen, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2021). Co-teaching in non-linear projects: A contextualised model of co-teaching to support educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103188.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103188
Heyer, Joseph Hallett; Thomas Ringel, Christian and Sarsted, Marco. (2015). Modeling structural equations of partial least squares. Translation: Adel Azar and Rasool Gholamzadeh, first edition, Tehran: Negah Danesh publishing (Text in Persian).
Hong, H. Y., & Lin, P. Y. (2019). Elementary students enhancing their understanding of energy-saving through idea-centered collaborative knowledge-building scaffolds and activities. Educational technology research and development67, 63-83.‏ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-016-9384-x
Hultén, M., Artman, H., & House, D. (2018). A model to analyse students’ cooperative idea generation in conceptual design. International journal of technology and design education, 28, 451-470.‏
Jessop, J. L. (2002). Expanding our students' brainpower: idea generation and critical thinking skills. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 44(6), 140-144.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2002.1167273
Jongbloed, J., Fanchini, A., & Dirani, A. (2016). Flourishing at school in France: Creativity and wellbeing in flux in preadolescence?. In Education and the Life Course: Determinants and Consequences of Unequal Educational Opportunities.‏
Klein, Paul (1994). Guide to factor analysis, translated by Seyed Jalal Sadr al-Sadat, Asghar Minaei, 4th edition, Samt Publications.
Korhonen, T., & Lavonen, J. (2017). A new wave of learning in Finland: Get started with innovation!. Educating for the 21st century: Perspectives, policies and practices from around the world, 447-467.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_24
Liu, X., & Chu, S. (2021). Exploring the efects of gamifcation pedagogy on children’s reading: A mixedmethod study on academic performance, reading-related mentality and behaviors, and sustainability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13057
Martin, Dixon, C., & Betser, S. (2018). Iterative design toward equity: Youth repertoires of practice in a high school maker space. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51 (1), 36–47.
Martín-del-Pozo, M., García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso, A., & Hernández Martín, A. (2019, August). Video games and collaborative learning in education? A scale for measuring in-service teachers’ attitudes towards collaborative learning with video games. In Informatics (Vol. 6, No. 3, p. 30). MDPI.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030030
Mollaahmadei, M., & Foroughi, A. (2021). Analysis of the three factors of ideation development on the consequences of qualitative development of growth centers with a mixed approach. Educational researches16(67), 219-252.‏
Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2009). The element: How finding your passion changes everything. Penguin.‏
Roointan, Z., Jalavandi, M., Nateghi, , F. (2022). validation of stories and storytelling with an emphasis on the objectives of the preschool curriculum of Kermanshah province; A combined study, New Educational Ideas Quarterly, Volume 18, Number 1, pp. 47-68. (Text in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2021.32910.3134
Roumezi, H., Hosseinpour, M., Bahmei, L., & Nasiri, M. (2020). Designing a model for the creation and development of knowledge-based companies in human sciences’ fields. Library and information sciences22(4), 119-151(Text in Persian).
Sáez-López, J. M., Grimaldo-Santamaría, R. Ó., Quicios-García, M. P., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2023). Teaching the Use of Gamification in Elementary School: A Case in Spanish Formal Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09656-8
Salamati, T., Vaezi , E., Memarpour,M., Rajabzadeh, A.(2016). Commercialization Model Design and Presentation of Proposed Algorithm of Knowledge Commercialization for the Higher Education. Quarterly Journal of Knowledge Recovery and Semantic Systems, Volume Three, Number Eight. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2017.22386.1134
Sannomiya, M., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2016). Creativity training in causal inference using the idea post-exposure paradigm: Effects on idea generation in junior high school students. Thinking skills and creativity22, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.006
Schoen, L., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2008). Innovation, NCLB, and the fear factor: The challenge of leading 21st-century schools in an era of accountability. Educational Policy22(1), 181-203.‏
Shavkatovna, S. R. N. (2021). Methodical Support Of Development Of Creative Activity Of Primary School Students. Conferencea, 74-76.
Simonton, D. K. (1990). Psychology, science, and history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sojoodi, M., Dehghani, M., Javadipour, M., & Zaefarian, R. (2024). A phenomenological study of the fundamental factors affecting the flourishing of idea Generation and innovation among elementary school students. Journal of Educational Sciences (Text in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2023.43940.3468
Solai., T, Vaezi. E., Mimarpour., M, Rajabzadeh, A (2015). Designing the commercialization model and presenting the proposed knowledge commercialization algorithm for higher education, Scientific studies, second year, number 8, pp. 77-105(Text in Persian).
Tolodel,. M, Tabesh, M. (2016). Learning environment design indicators for environmental learning, international conference on civil engineering, architecture and urban planning in contemporary Iran (Text in Persian).
 Ucus, S., & Acar, I. H. (2018). Teachers' innovativeness and teaching approach: The mediating role of creative classroom behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(10), 1697-1711.‏https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7100
Valacich, J. S., Jung, J. H., & Looney, C. A. (2006). The effects of individual cognitive ability and idea stimulation on idea-generation performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice10(1), 1.https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1089-2699.10.1.1
Wagner, T. (2010). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need-and what we can do about it. Read How You Want. com.‏
Weber, C. (2012). Idea–invention–innovation: strategies, approaches, research challenges. In DS 70: Proceedings of DESIGN 2012, the 12th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia (pp. 1265-1274).
Wiltschnig, S., Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2013). Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design. Design Studies, 34(5), 515-542.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.002
Yaqoubi, A., & Jahan, F. (2014). Comparison of the effectiveness of sharp education and brainstorming on students' creativity, Journal of Educational Thoughts, Volume 11, Number 1(Text in Persian).
Yıldırım, N., & Ansal, H. (2016, September). First domino tile in the social innovation process: Idea creation of university students. In 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (pp. 296-306). IEEE.‏ https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806728
Zarifi, S. F., Moosakhani, M., Azar, A., & Alvani, S. M. (2018). Commercialization of Entrepreneurial Ideas in the Renewable Energy Industry. Journal of Energy Planning And Policy Research, 4(1), 193-219(Text in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2018.3717
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through differentiated science inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education14(4), 77-91.http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/tused.10214a