مطالعه تطبیقی چگونگی ارزشیابی از درس در دانشگاه های ایران و دانشگاه های برتر جهان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی در آموزش عالی، دانشگاه اصفهان، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، اصفهان، ایران

2 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه اصفهان، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، اصفهان، ایران

3 استاد گروه مدیریت آموزشی و توسعه منابع انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش بررسی تطبیقی چگونگی ارزشیابی از درس در دانشگاه‌های ایران و دانشگاه‌های برتر جهان بوده است. به این منظور دانشگاه های تهران، فردوسی مشهد و اصفهان به‌منظور مقایسه با 16 دانشگاه برتر قاره های مختلف از 6 کشور آمریکا، انگلستان، سنگاپور، آفریقای جنوبی، استرالیا و ترکیه با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب گردیدند. روش پژوهش، تطبیقی و چهار مرحله ای جرج بردی است که فرایند مقایسه در قالب چهار مرحله توصیف، تفسیر، هم جواری و مقایسه انجام گرفت. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات سیاهه مربوط به اطلاعات حاصل از منابع دست اول و دوم چگونگی ارزشیابی درس دانشگاه های مختلف جهان بود که در سایت ها و اسناد مربوطه در دسترس بود. داده ها پس از جمع‌آوری و توصیف در قالب جداول مورد تفسیر و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد دانشگاه های ایران برای ارزشیابی فقط از ابزار پرسشنامه توسط دانشجوی شرکت‌کننده در درس استفاده می کنند در حالی که ارزشیابی در دانشگاه های مختلف جهان توسط دانشجویان فعلی، دانش آموختگان، همکاران، گروه ها و انجمن های علمی و تخصصی انجام می گرفت. نتایج همچنین حاکی از آن است که همه ی دانشگاه های مورد پژوهش از پرسشنامه پایان ترم جهت ارزشیابی از درس استفاده می کردند. ارزشیابی از عناصر برنامه درسی درس در دانشگاه ها متفاوت است. در برخی از دانشگاه ها فقط دو عنصر، در حالی که در برخی دیگر از سایر عناصر برنامه درسی نیز ارزشیابی به عمل می آید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparative Study of assessment Procedures in Universities of Iran and World Top Universities

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mostafa Bagherian Far 1
  • Ahmad Reza Nasr Esfahani 2
  • Mohammad Reza Ahanchian 3
1 Ph.D Candidate of Curriculum Studies in higher education, University of Isfahan, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Isfahan, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Education, University of Isfahan, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Isfahan, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of educational management and human resource development, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

The major objective of the present study was to conduct a comparative study of the assessment procedures in the universities of Iran and world top universities. To this end, using purposive sampling, we opted for universities of Tehran, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, and Isfahan from were selected in order to be compared with 16 top universities of different continent. Thus, we opted for 16 universities from the United States of America, England, South Africa, Australia, and Turkey. In so much as the methodology is concerned, we shall employ Jeorge Bordi's comparative and four-staged model which embarks upon the comparative processes in terms of four stages of description, interpretation, adjacency, and comparison. The data collection tools include a respective list related to the information driven out of the first and second hand resources of assessment procedures in different universities of the world. These sets of information were available online in respective documents and websites. After data were collected and described, we interpreted and analysed them in terms of different tables. The findings indicated that the universities of Iran make use of questionnaires that are filled out by the students that have taken the respective course/s. This is whilst the assessment procedures in different universities of the world is undertaken by the existing students, graduates, colleagues, departments and Scientific and professional unions. The related results showed that all universities under research employ semester-final questionnaire to assess a course.Assessing the elements of a course curriculum is different in universities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • comparative analysis
  • evaluation course
  • curriculum
  • Top University

مراجع

داودنیا، بهزاد و زارعی‌زوارکی، اسماعیل (1393). مطالعه تطبیقی مدیریت آموزشی و برنامه درسی مدارس هوشمند کشورهای استرالیا، مالزی و ایران. اندیشه‌های نوین تربیتی، 10(2): 145 – 193.
قربانی، سمیه.، نیلی، محمدرضا و دلبری، سمیرا (1393). مطالعۀ تطبیقی ارزیابی کیّفیت برنامه درسی آموزش عالی. دو فصلنامه مطالعات برنامۀ درسی آموزش عالی، 9(1): 90 – 106.
نصر، احمدرضا.، سولومونیدز، این و کامرون، الیسون (1392). علل و چگونگی تدوین درس جدید و موانع آن در دانشگاه‌های استرالیا. پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، 17(3): 42 – 18.
Akker, J, V, D. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An Introduction: In J. van den Akker, U. Hameyer, & W. Kuiper (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1-10). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Alderman, L. S. and Towers, S. B. (2012). Student feedback systems in higher education: A Focused literature review and environmental scan. Quality in Higher Education. 18 (3): 261–280.
Baker, K. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students writing process. Active Learn High Education. 17(3):1-14.
Bamber, V. and S. Anderson. (2012). Evaluating learning and teaching. International Journal for Academic Development. 17 (1): 5–18.
Blair, E. and Noel. V. K. (2014). Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: Is the student voice being heard?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 39 (7): 879–940.
Boyce, A. S. and McGowan, B. L. (2019). An exploration of two novice evaluation Educators’ experiences developing and implementing introduction to evaluation courses. American Journal of Evaluation. 40(1): 119-136.
Braga, M., Paccagnella, M. and Pellizzari, M. (2014). Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors. Economics of Education Review. 41: 71-88.‏
Carrell, S. E. and West, J. E. (2010). Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. Journal of Political Economy. 118: 409–432.
Chang, C. C. (2008). Enhancing self-perceived effects using Web-based portfolio assessment. Computers in Human Behavior. 24(4): 1753–1771.
DaCosta-Marques, M. D. and Mano, M. (2012). The process of evaluation and accreditation of higher education courses in portugal: Analysis of the impacts arising from the preliminary accreditation. Journal US-China Public Admin. 9: 303-315.
Dancer, D.  and Kamvounias. P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: a project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 30 (4): 445–540.
Davodnia, B. and Zareizvarki, I. (2014). A comparative study of educational management and curriculum of smart schools in Australia, Malaysia and Iran. New Thoughts on Educational. 10 (2): 145 - 193 (Text in Persian).
DeLuca, C., Coombs, A. and LaPointe-McEwan, D. (2019). Assessment mindset: Exploring the relationship between teacher mindset and approaches to classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 61: 159-169.
Denson, N., Loveday, T. and Dalton, H. (2010). Student evaluation of courses: What predicts satisfaction?. Higher Education Research & Development. 29(4): 339-356.
Diamond, R. M. (2004). The Usefulness of Structured Mid-Term Feedback as a Catalyst for Change in Higher Education. Active Learning in Higher Education. 5 (3): 217–231.
Edstrom, K. (2008). Doing course evaluations as if learning matters most. Higher Education Research and Development. 27(2): 95–106.
Erikson, M., M. Erikson, and E. Punzi. (2016). Student Response to a Reflective Course Evaluation. Reflective Practice. 17 (6): 663–675.
Eskici, M. (2015). University students’ opinions on application of portfolio in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 174: 2946-2955.
Ghorbani, S. Nili, M. R. and Delbari, S. (2014). A comparative study evaluating the quality of higher education curriculum. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies: 9 (1): 90-106 (Text in Persian).
Hadad, Y., Keren, B. and Naveh, G. (2020). The relative importance of teaching evaluation criteria from the points of view of students and faculty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 45(3): 447-459.‏
Hall, C. E. (2014). Toward a model of curriculum analysis and evaluation—beka: A case study from australia. Nurse Education Today. 34(3): 343-348.
Harun, S., Dazz, S. K., Saaludin, N. and Ahmad, W. S. C. W. (2011). Lecturers’ perception on student evaluation at universiti kuala lumpur. In Enhancing Learning: Teaching & Learning Conference. 1(10).
Hoo, H. T., Tan, K. and Deneen, C. (2020). Negotiating self-and peer-feedback with the use of reflective journals: an analysis of undergraduates’ engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 45(3): 431-446.
Hou, A. Y. C. (2011). Quality assurance at a distance: international accreditation in Taiwan higher education. Higher Education. 61(2): 179-191.
Huybers, T. (2014). Student Evaluation of Teaching: The use of best-worst scaling. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 39 (4): 496–513.
Kahn, S. (2007). Better teaching through better evaluation. To Improve the Academy, 12 (1), 111-126.
Kember, D. and Leung, D. Y. (2008). Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 33(4): 341-353.
Kessler, C. and Nadjm-Tehrani, S. (2002). Mid-term course evaluations with muddy cards. In Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education; 233-234.
Klein, M.F. (1985). Curriculum design. International encyclopedia of education: curriculum studies. Volume II. Husen, T. and Postlethwaite editors, Pergamon Press: Oxford England. 1163-1170.
Klimova, B. F. (2014). Self-reflection in the course evaluation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 141: 119-123.
Kumpas-Lenk, K., Tucker, B. M. and Gupta, R. (2014). Validation of a unit evaluation survey for capturing students’ perceptions of teaching and learning: A comparison among australian and estonian higher education students. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 43: 178-185.
Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X. and Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 45(2): 193-211.
Macfadyen, L. P., Dawson, S., Prest, S. and Gašević, D. (2016). Whose feedback? A multilevel analysis of student completion of end-of-term teaching evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 41 (6): 821–839.
Marzano, R. J. (2012). Teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership. 70(3): 14-19.
McClain, L., Gulbis, A. and Hays, D. (2018). Honesty on student evaluations of teaching: effectiveness, purpose, and timing matter!. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43(3): 369-385.
McGowan, R. W. (2009). Faculty and student perceptions of the effects of mid-course evaluations on learning and teaching. PhD Diss., Department of Instructional Psychology & Technology, Brigham Young University.
Mitry, D. J. and Smith, D. E. (2014). Student evaluations of faculty members: A Call for analytical prudence. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. 25(2).
Nasr, A. R. Solomonides, I.  and Cameron, E. (2013). Reasons and how to develop a new course and its obstacles in Australian universities. Research and writing of academic books. 17 (3): 42-18 (Text in Persian).
Nikolaou, M. and Atkinson, M. (2019). Do student and survey characteristics affect the quality of UK undergraduate medical education course evaluation? A systematic review of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 62: 92-103.
Oermann, M. H., Shellenbarger, T. and Gaberson, K. (2017). Clinical teaching strategies in nursing. Springer Publishing Company.
Oon, P. T., Spencer, B. and Kam, C. C. S. (2017). Psychometric quality of a student evaluation of teaching survey in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 42(5): 788-800.
Pabst, R., Nave, H., Rothkötter, H. J. and Tschernig, T. (2001). Evaluation of the medical curriculum: why, when, by whom and for whom should questionnaires be used. European journal of morphology. 39(4): 237-239
Poth, C. N., Searle, M., Aquilina, A. M., Ge, J. and Elder, A. (2020). Assessing competency-based evaluation course impacts: A mixed methods case study. Evaluation and Program Planning. 79: 101789.
Powell, T. (2013). The importance of assessments: How portfolios can impact students' self-efficacy and comprehension in an online graphic design course. Unpublished PhD Thesis Capella University, Minneapolis.
Richardson, J.T. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 30(4): 387–415.
Shah, M. and Nair, C. S. (2012). The changing nature of teaching and unit evaluations in Australian universities. Quality Assurance in Education. 20(3): 274–288.
Sozer, E. M., Zeybekoglu, Z. and Kaya, M. (2019). Using mid-semester course evaluation as a feedback tool for improving learning and teaching in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 44(7): 1003-1016.‏
Spiel, C., Schober, B. and Reimann, R. (2006). Evaluation of curricula in higher education: challenges for evaluators. Evaluation Review. 30(4): 430-450.
Spooren, P., Mortelmans, D. and Christiaens, W. (2014). Assessing the validity and reliability of a quick scan for student's evaluation of teaching. Results from confirmatory factor analysis and G Theory. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 43: 88-94.
Steyn, C., Davies, C. and Sambo, A. (2019). Eliciting student feedback for course development: the application of a qualitative course evaluation tool among business research students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 44(1): 11-24.
Struyven, K,. Dochy, F. and Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 30(4): 325 - 341.
Wickramasinghe, R. S. and M. W. Timpson. (2006). Mid-Semester student feedback enhances student learning. Education for Chemical Engineers. 1 (1): 126–133.
Yusuf, A., R., Ajidagba, U. A., Agbonna, S. A. and Olumorin, C. O. (2010). University teachers’ perception of the effects of students evaluation of teaching on lecturers instructional practices in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 1stInternational Conference of Collaborational of Education Faculties in West Africa (CEFWA); 1-16.
Zineldin, M., Akdag, H. C. and Vasicheva, V. (2011). Assessing quality in higher education: New criteria for evaluating students’ satisfaction. Quality in Higher Education. 17(2): 231-243.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار